Comparison

Call Pet vs WardenCam

WardenCam requires a Gmail account on both devices and saves recordings to Google Drive. Call Pet requires no account and never stores your footage anywhere.

Call Pet WardenCam
Account Required No — pair with QR code, no registration Yes — Gmail required on both devices
Ads None Free version has ads
Video Storage Never stored — live streaming only Saved to your Google Drive or Dropbox
Encryption End-to-end — X25519 key exchange + AES-GCM stream encryption Not publicly disclosed
P2P Streaming Yes — WebRTC peer-to-peer Yes — with server relay fallback when P2P fails
Platform iOS + Android iOS + Android
Price Free, no ads Free (with ads) + $5.99 one-time upgrade

Key Differences

Account and data flow

WardenCam requires a Gmail account on both the camera and viewer devices — both phones must be signed into Google. Recordings are saved to your Google Drive or Dropbox, meaning your footage passes through and is stored by a third-party cloud service. Call Pet requires no account and never stores footage anywhere.

Encryption transparency

WardenCam describes its streams as encrypted but does not publicly document the specific protocols used or whether encryption is end-to-end. Call Pet uses X25519 key exchange and AES-GCM stream encryption — both are industry-standard, openly documented algorithms, and the encryption keys are generated on your devices and never leave them.

Recording vs. live-only

WardenCam supports continuous recording saved to Google Drive or Dropbox. This is useful if you need to review what happened while you were away. Call Pet is live-view only — storing no footage is a deliberate privacy decision.

Choose Call Pet if

You want no account required, maximum privacy, and you don't need video recording or playback.

Choose WardenCam if

You want video recording saved to your own Google Drive, or you prefer an Android-first setup.

Try Call Pet

End-to-end encrypted pet monitoring. Turn your spare phone into a private camera. Free to download.

Download Free →